Summary S. In addition to the leader s, the six tests of this participating test have achieved five-star grades.
In the past, we mentioned the car collision experiment, more of IIHS and C-NCAP, but since China is born in China, C-NCAP’s “old predecessor” in domestic cars gradually has marginalized trends. Indeed, for the car collision, there are few countries, such as China, have two collision mechanisms. So, in the case of the middle of the world, the collision test of C-NCAP, is it necessary?
Different from the inhibitory and C-NCAP, mainly reflected At two points, one is the purpose of the purpose, and the other of the test items are different. First, the former, China’s main research is to make many insurance companies can develop different premiums for vehicle safety, and have a greater impact on consumers. The C-NCAP is affiliated to the State-owned Assets Supervision Commission of the State Council, and the impact of collision results is not large, and more reflects the promotional or upgrading of automotive products.
On test items, both have a large difference. The current test items are 7 big items. In addition to the projects of side collision testing and pedestrian collision tests, the remaining projects have been in-depth. For details, you can see it from the table below.
Here you can give you a science, the difference between the two test items, in fact, in fact, there is a big relationship with their reference lines. China’s research refer to IIHS collision test, the 25% biased collision of “Zi Jinlo Road” is a new proposed concept in recent years, so many products have not been done without “test education”. Go to the whole body. C-NThe CAP reference is the E-CNAP of the European ministries, so it is more emphasized in the frontal collision, and the low speed of collision is not in the positive collision, and there is more “cyclone” in the bias collision. 
Perhaps in many people’s eyes, C-NCAP has become a five-star club, and the Sino-Bao Policy will be more truth. And from the nature, the collision results of the medium-protected research will affect the interests of the insurance company, coupled with the cases of collision and C-NCAP have many collision results, and therefore make many people think the results of China More authority.
But in fact, even if it is a medium-purpose research, is it in the wind wave in the beginning of last year? In fact, due to the difference between the purpose and test items, the two institutions have different collision structures of the same model. For example, in a frontal collision, the collision speed used in China is 15km / h, while the collision speed of C-NCAP reaches 50km / h. For example, in the bias collision, the angle used in China is 25deg; and the C-NCAP’s collision angle reached 40deg; in such a difference, the collision score is still the same, that is, it is ghost.
Objectively, current C-NCAP still has reference value, and C-NCAP and medium security due to standards and projects There is a mutual confirmation between research, which will make consumers have more comprehensive understanding. It is very simple, the test model of China is low, but we all know that the sales surface of low-equipped models is actually unneaked. So how do you have more understanding of the safety of vehicles? C-NCAP collision testing can supplement this, although its collision vehicle source is a car company, it is often covered by high high school, and therefore, C-NCAP will be more comprehensive.
In the past, we vomiting C-NCAP, except “five-star club” outside,Also includes its low standards. It can be said that it is precisely because of its low standards, the appearance of a large number of “five-star models”. However, after the introduction of the medium security research, C-NCAP significantly accelerated its update to the standard. Of course, there is a reason for the E-NCAP standard update, but the impact of competition relationships cannot be ignored. 
In the current coexisting competitive environment, C-NCAP and medium-compliance research have more stringent control, and faster Update speed. For example, in the 2020 version of the Journey to the Editor’s draft, the bumper has joined three new tests, enriching the membership safety testing projects in the car, and joined in vehicle auxiliary safety tests. 3 new test items.
Intrinsically, the essence of the car collision test is also “touched the stone”, such as a luxury car in the 1990s, at the time Perhaps it is safe and reliable, but it may not be a star today. Therefore, there is only a better development of car security to make car safety.
For China’s research and C-NCAP, they are like IELTS and TOEFL, and there is also a different point of focus. The direction of the topic is also entitled. For car products as candidates. Say, this difference but a certain degree of complementary standards can be required to have more comprehensive strength. For consumers, this is undoubtedly Baili and has no harm.
(Image source network, intrusion) 