Recently, China’s research released the latest batch of collision test results, the ideal one and the 蔚 来 EC6 as the new power of the new forces, in column, before, we have explained the collision test of the 蔚 来 EC6 Performance, the result is still very satisfactory. Today, let’s take a look at the ideal one with new forces, how is the safety.
From the perspective of total evaluation, the performance of ideal one is not bad, especially the project related to the safety of the occupant in the car, all obtained G (Excellent) The evaluation, but in turn, the culcimacy and maintenance economics of the low-speed collision are only M (general). Next, we analyze the interpretation of several key projects for ideal one.
The first is a low speed collision of speed 15km / h, which simulates the rear-end accident of daily urban traffic traffic conditions. In this test, Ideal One is divided into M, mainly lost in maintenance economics, whether it is positive or rear-end, and the maintenance cost is not low. Fortunately, there is no unexpected explosive airbag at a low speed collision, avoiding the cost of repairing the car, and does not cause accidental injuries to the fake because of the low-speed airbag.
In the front 25% bias collision of everyone’s most concerned, Ideal One’s ONE is divided into G, and the performance is good. However, it can be seen from the detail to the ideal one of the evaluation of the constraint system, including the [partial front airbag effect], [side gas curtain coverage is limited], [occupant pour oversight]. These three indicated that the front airbags of ideal one do not completely receive the head of the dummy, the side gas curtain is too small, and the safety belt constraint is not enough.
From the perspective of the car, the fake person does have excessive precursor in the collision, and the area covered by the side gas curtain is relatively small, close to the portion of the A column is completely unclosed, and the fake people push the left front. When the side gas curtain cannot bear the head of the fake person, causing the front airbags not completely caught the dummy.
, just as we earned the evaluation of other models mentioned, the medium-compliant research collision test, eventually to see [fake Hurt. Because of this, ideal one has a problem of constraint systems in the 25% bias collision, but for the fake person’s harm is relatively low, it is finally able to obtain G’s evaluation. Just in accordance with the collision of the officially published the collision, the ideal one of the A column and thresholds have a deformation, indicating that the structural strength of the vehicle or the collision structure design also improves space.
This is also described again. For new energy vehicles, since there is a battery pack in the bottom of the vehicle, the transverse cumping of the vehicle must be It is better than traditional fuel gains to protect the battery. Because in the side collision, the vehicle does not have too much absorbent space, and it is completely “hard anti-anti-anti-“.
From the perspective of the vehicle, it can be seen that the front and rear row of the entire standard effectively protects the head of the dummy, avoiding The collision is hurt. However, from the deployment range of front rowless air curtains can also be seen that the side gas curtain of ideal one is indeed a small area, which only covers the area of half of the front side, and it is desirable that the manufacturer can replace a larger side gas curtain in subsequent reservations.
In the test of the vehicle auxiliary safety system, the performance of ideal one is very stable, and it is divided into g, the active brake system can effectively avoid the occurrence of the accident. . As a new energy vehicle with a standard driving assistance system, avoiding accidents is the most basic capability, and ideal one is not surprising.
Overall, ideal one of the mid-borne collision test performance is not bad, remove 25 percent bias collision in the limit of restraint system Other projects are quite stable. Nowadays, China has been publicly operated for 3 years. The new cars launched by various manufacturers have also begun to strengthen the body structure, and the collision testing of the inventory has begun to be valued by the Main Factory, which is definitely a good thing for consumers.