Skip to content

Tesla, is there only brakes fail?

Respect life is to respect the moral bottom line of all human beings, and it is also the bottom line of the development of technology development.

In recent days, Tesla’s team is full of fire, in extreme Professional techniques attempt to transfer contradictory focus, and rob that they think of moral highlands and draw themselves one of the victims of the rights incident. It seems that the warmth of the warm relationship is a hidden needle, and the temperament is still maintaining a sense of weakness, and the means refurbishment is only without any substantial refund.

From a scientific perspective, any fault includes a braking failure failure can be solved by technical diagnosis, but Tesla failure is only a brake?

First in terms of professionalism, Tesla, a series of public relations actions show their incredible porshereality. On the one hand, it is very professional to use various resources to bring the wind direction, the techniques are simple and the routines are quite deep; on the one hand, they have attracted sympathy and attention, and the behavior is naive and the cavity is taken.

The so-called professional is our familiar public relations, transferring contradictions to the defenders itself, guiding public opinion to point to defenders, the so-called behind-the-scenes referring to, etc. Non-technical problems, avoiding light transfer line; on the other hand, on the platform of Weibo and other platforms, the broodow, the netizens who are unknown, support take-out orders, these netizens from all over the country are actually familiar with each employee’s specific taste. I really underestimate the IQ.

There is a crude style, the higher the monkey climb, the more obvious the buttocks. In other words, the expression of the civilization is, and it is desperately despising the new clothes. Maybe it is true, perhaps true, maybe it’s really ignorant, so I believe it.

In the spirit of the enterprise, Tesla is a cobo, but technology should notIt is cold. Tesla is a physicist Nicholas Middot; Tesla. Yes, not Nicholas Middot; Capital (Zhao Si), is the one who is indoor manufacturing lightning physicist, inventor, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer.

With the company name, the name of the company, Mask’s ambition has been gradually exposed in recent years. His goal is not to establish a new energy kingdom, but to conquer the earth or even outer space. His bold and arrogant won the worship of many fans.

When Masci Tesla Eco-world, consumers willing tolerate the defects of the product, don’t worry, and I will follow the scientific beliefs. And this belief is now being crazy.

GO Electric is Tesla’s corporate slogan, but the current Tesla is not self-in-provoking, but also a so-called “adoption of consumer rights action. The confrontational attitude of the necessary action. Ignore the right to life, ignore technical hidden dangers, and the company slogan is changed to Go Dead seems to be more in line with their temperament.

In terms of moral bottom line, theoretical in theory and technology diagnosis in theoretical diagnosis in theoretical diagnosis, the purpose of public relations is to appear in public opinion Evolution contradictions and fight for technical diagnosis and release solutions. We have no emotions to judge Tesla without cold, but slow heat, just think they are exploring the root causes, but the performance of the public relations team has exceeded the category of professional ethics, the means is bad and low, which acts as a wind Take a teammate.

At the beginning, Tesla Model S has played a number of spontaneous combustion accidents worldwide, and users have promoted their battery technology in the cost of life. Technical progress will definitely pay the price, but should consumers should be the price? Is there anything more important than life in this world? Respect life is the basic bottom line of human moral standards.

[123If the spontaneous combustion accident is used to give the state grid or the user is improper, where is the Tasla’s moral bottom line? Something, where is the bottom of the face, but never reflect?

Never ignore the sound from the consumer and folk. The brake failing incident triggered the basis of the underlying logic of Tesla software system. There is a saying that it is worth exploring: When a single operating system takes a minute-time mechanism to handle multi-port instruction set, there must be a difference in priority. The underlying of the Tesla operating system is Linux, essentially with Windows, Android or Apple iOS.

When we use mobile phones, it is not sure which program card is not sure, I hope that I can’t hold Testra’s brake instruction set. Scientific point, in the Tesla software system, smart driving, braking, kinetic energy recovery, etc., is there a logically bug?

It is well known that the vehicle rule-level system and the safety standard of the chip are much higher than the consumer. Some experts believe that Tesla’s systems and chips may not be a car level, but consumer. The priority of the brake instructions in most car products, the radical solution is even preferentially in all intelligent control systems. This truth should take a product.

From the global scale, the so-called coupon brakes are hard to even, Tesla’s self-confidence is in the mouth of the public relations team. ” Very few “extreme fragile in front of the second level, the braking failure of the secondary milliseconds will be fatal. Obviously, as a hardware supplier’s Bosch does not want to make a cooker, Tesla is going to add a pot to consumers? Even if Tesla’s engineers may be in a confused state, at least take a scientific and rigorous attitude.

We are very affirmative that Tesla’s engineers are not ignorant, just for the possible BUG that cannot be monitored in real time. In fact, Tesla’s question is not only Tesla’s problem, but the problem of all human beings to face. In the process of intelligent, artificial intelligence and other technological development,It must be faced with various possibilities. Therefore, Tesla should maintain an open mentality, let technology discuss the personal attack, use scientific alternative to arrogance, use rational alternative to the situation, this is a virtue.

Why is the 230 models of the world’s 75% automotive enterprises selected real-time system QNX as the underlying architecture, and the priority command set about life is the most critical. index? The core is respect for users, respect for scientific respect, respect for life.

Respecting life is to respect the moral bottom line of all human beings, and it is also the bottom line of technology development progress.

Finally, we still want to ask Tesla, what is your bottom line? At least from the current series of performances, in addition to the brake failure, your professional, corporate spirit and moral bottom line are also systematic due to “priority” problem systemic?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version