Although the Shanghai Auto Show has been over more than a day, Teslawi rights have still not contained. The owner continues to be in the rights, Tesla is still pulling.
See the word “pulling”, if you think I am intended to smear Ttersla, then you can slip away. The reason why I dare to say is that since the incident, Tesla’s performance has really been very puzzled, and even some strange.
If I think I said something, then I will look down.
According to her, in recent days, she and her family are still rushing for rights protection, and said to maintain rights.
And for Tesla official “Since February, Tesla is actively communicating with Ms. Zhang and his family” and is the best effort “and pregnancy. Description.
First, Ms. Zhang clearly said that from March 27th to April 19th However, Tesla did not take the initiative to contact him. Even if it is WeChat, the phone is not. When she found Tesra Zhengzhou Futia store for communication, the reply of the store had only one: they are Tesla’s direct stores, headquarters in Shanghai, need to apply to the Shanghai headquarters to respond. Even if I arrived at the Shanghai Auto Show, there is no Tesla’s related staff to dock with her. In desperation, she chose the roof right.
Second, for the question of claiming to pregnancy, Ms. Zhang did not deny it. However, her explanation is to worry that she will be hurt, so I said the sentence.
For Ms. Zhang said, the speed of the car believes that credibility is still very high. Because in the face of the media interview,As a normal person, it is impossible to go to Hu.
Furthermore, Ms. Zhang believes that Tesla apologizes after the incident, is mainly due to the pressure of public opinion. There is no positive role in the progress of the rights incident. And, on the afternoon of April 21, Tesla related staff found her, let her compensate the vehicle that climbs the roof on the top of the car show.
Finally, it is also the most important thing, Tesla is half an hour. The data shows that the speed of the vehicle is 118.5 kilometers per hour when the driver last step on the brake pedal.
For this data, Ms. Zhang clearly pointed out that Tesla deliberately According to her memories, the speed of the accident should be around 60-70km. Simultaneously. Ms. Zhang also said that the road session is not allowed to be too fast, and they have always hoped that Tesla related workers can restore the entire event. However, Testla official did not send people to the scene.
Currently confirmed that on the afternoon of February 21, Ms. Zhang father driving When this Tesla Model 3 drove to the incident section, after the brake suddenly failed, after the two cars, two cars hit the roadside cement protection bar.
After the accident, the accident certificate issued by the traffic control department, but said that there is no safety shift with the front car, and has not stated that speeding.
We are obvious in the statement issued from Tesla on April 19 It can be seen that Teslashi said the car show on the spot of the car owners for the “Henan Anyang speed violation accident car owner”.
In the view of the car, Tesla emphasized the “speed” two words, the most important purpose may also confuse the audio-visual, guide the audience, the case, the most importantThe reason is that the speed is too fast. The problem is in the person, not in the car.
As for the vehicle, it hits the roadside cement protection bar with how fast speed is, and the other words are currently in. But we can take a look at the accident vehicle. Objectively analyze, if it is really like Tesla, it hits 118.5 kilometers per hour, then the damage of the vehicle should be more serious.
Finally, in the face of the interview of the media, Ms. Zhang shouted in the world. Vice President Tao Lin: Tao Lin said that Ms. Zhang asked Teslaso, if they couldn’t take evidence, they need to apologize to Ms. Zhang.
In addition, Ms. Zhang also asked Tesla to fulfill his commitment and gave her a complete original driving data in the first half of the accident. As for Tesla, she will pay attention to Tesla’s responsibility according to law.