Skip to content

The latest collision results in China, the German models are stable, and the EC6 score is surprised.

A few days ago, China’s research and development has built the latest batch of vehicle collision results. There are seven models that participate in the collision test. From the collision results, in addition to the Canghuai A5 has a (good) rating in the car in the car, the remaining 6 models have obtained the G (excellent) rating. So next, let’s take a look at the 7 models of this participating collision, how is their specific results?

First let’s take a look at the Audi Q5L, the model participating in the collision test is 2020 40TFSI Enjoy the progressive, official guidance price of 387,800 yuan. Although it is an entry version, it is equipped with a front-rowless airbag and a front / rear head gas curtain in addition to the front venting bag. So from the specific project, in the front 25% bias collision project of everyone, Audi Q5L still achieved the G (excellent) rating, of which the vehicle structure, the rating of the essence of the occupant is A (good), and The rating of the extracorporeal invasion of the occupant is G (excellent).

From the actual collision performance, the car head portion has a serious deformation, but it has achieved full resistance, which also keeps the occupant compartment structure complete. At the same time, the front airbags in the car and the head gas curtain are open, and the occupants in the car play a good protection. In addition, the Audi Q5L has also achieved G (excellent) rating in terms of roof collision, car side collision, pedestrian protection and auxiliary safety.

BMW X3 this time participating in the collision test model is 2020 XDrive 25i M sports suit Edition, official guidance price of 389,800 yuan. From a security configuration, the model is equipped with a front air bag, a front-side airbag, and a front and rear roller curtain. As can be seen from the collision results, all projects of BMW X3 have gained G (excellent) rating in the 25% offset collision test. From the actual collision performance, the front of the front is sufficient, the seat can be complete, the door can be opened normally, and all the airbags are also normal, and the maximum extent guarantees the occupants in the car.Safety. In addition, on the test project of camping and maintenance economics, BMW X3 only obtained P (poor) rating, the above Audi Q5L is also the same. The reason for this score is that the later maintenance cost of the luxury brand model is more expensive, even after a low speed collision, it will produce a small maintenance fee.

Toyota RAV4 honor participated in this test model is 2020 2.0L gasoline version The fashion version (the name is taken from the officially released officially released), Xiao Zhi believes that the test vehicle should be 2020 2.0L two-wheel drive style in accordance with the test practice of the Chinese. This model has also joined the front of the conventional airbag configuration. / Rear row head gas curtain and lap airbag. From the test results, Toyota RAV4 has gained G (excellent) rating on all items in 25% offset collision test. From the actual collision performance, Toyota RAV4 honored the front of the head seriously deformed, but the absorbing energy is sufficient, which makes the cabin stay intact, and the door can also be opened normally. The auxiliary of the airbag has enabled the cabin to get a full-scale protection.

In addition, Toyota RAV4 honor has also obtained G (excellent) rating in terms of side collision, roof intensity, pedestrian protection, and assistive safety. It is worth mentioning that on the test project of the thadility and maintenance economy, Toyota RAV4 has gained M (general) rating, which also proves that after the low speed collision, the fees needed for later maintenance is not too many.

Ideal One is involved in this test type of 2020 extension 6, The official guidance price is 328,000 yuan. From the security configuration, the car is equipped with front air bag, front-sided airbag, front and rear roller air curtains, and lap airbags. From a specific project, G (excellent) is obtained in the 25% bias collision test, G (excellent) is obtained in the vehicle structure and the harm injury. However, on the constraint system and the dummy movement project, a (good) score is obtained because the side head protection airbag is limited, and the coverage is limited.The occupant excessively touched before the collision.

In addition, in terms of camping and maintenance economics, ideal One has achieved M (general) rating, and the loss of the vehicle maintenance economy. But considering the price of this car, you can get M (general) rating or acceptable. In addition, in terms of pedestrian protection, assist security, etc., ideal one has obtained G (excellent) rating.

蔚 来 EC6 as a pure electric vehicle model, I want everyone to collide with its collision curious. The model of the collision is 2020 430km sports version, and the official guidance price is 368,000 yuan. From the security configuration, the car is equipped with front air bag, front-sided airbag, front and rear roller curtains. From a specific project, in the 25% bias collision test, the 蔚 来 EC6 has obtained G (excellent) rating on all segments. And from the actual collision performance, the front of the head is serious, but it has played a very good effect of unloading resistance, thereby ensuring the integrity of the cabin, and the door can also open normally. At the same time, the internal airbags are all normally opened to ensure the safety of occupants.

It is worth mentioning that 蔚 来 EC6 has achieved A (good) rating in camping and maintenance economy, which is the only rating in this test. Model.

Qichen Star participated in the model of this test, 2020 260t, respectively Manual star Edition and 2020 260T 48V light mixing increase the star enjoys version, the former official guidance price is 1.096 million yuan, while the latter’s official guidance price is 1.336 million yuan. The reason why two models participated in the test, because 2020 260T manual Star Yue version did not equip the actions of active safety, and from the collision score of this model, in the 25% offset collision test, Qichen Xing was in addition to A (good) rating is obtained outside the A (good) rating and the dummy sports project. The main reason for the loss in the constraint system and the dummy sports project is that it is not equipped with a side headFull airbag.

From the actual collision performance, Qichen Xing has played a capability after the collision, but the main shutter is deformed, and the a column is slightly bent. At the same time, in the side collision project, Qichen has gained a (good) rating, why is thereained less side head airbags, which is insufficient to protect the driver’s head protection. In terms of vehicle auxiliary safety, Qichen Star is also a G (excellent) rating.

In the 7 models, Jianghuai Jiayue A5 is the only one in the car. The occupant security index and the model of the A (good) rating on both the car external pedestrian safety index. This “Jianghuai Jiayue A5 participated in the collision model of 2021 1.5T + 6MT II version of the elite and 2021 1.5T + CVT Issue, two models still participated in different projects. From a specific project, in the 25% bias collision test, Jianghuai Jiayue A5 only achieved M (general) rating, from the actual collision performance, the car was bent and deformed after the collision, and the head part of the head The upper part of the cabin, plus the number of airbags, limited to the occupants.

In addition, the car only obtained P (poor) rating in camping and maintenance economy, except that the vehicle maintenance economy is low, the cousin of the car is also not tall. In addition, Jianghuai Jiayue A5 won the G (excellent) rating in terms of vehicle auxiliary safety.

The above is the 7 models of the type of model, the safety of BMW, Audi is as stable, and the post-maintenance cost is also as expensive. Ideal One and the collision score of Wei Si EC6 is worth a good job. However, the results of Jianghuai Jiayue A5 are general, and under low speed collision, the scores of campaign and maintenance economics are not high, and it is awkward. So, what do you think about this collision? Welcome to the comment area and Xiao Zhi.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version