Collision Test is an important channel for automobile consumers to understand the level of automobile safety. Last week, China’s collision test circle network red and medium-draft auto security index C-IASI released the results of the second batch of collision tests in 2021, of which Come to EC6 and Ideal One as the current domestic new energy field when the red fried chicken, the test results are very concerned, today, the state teacher moves out the test results of Tesla Model3 released in June 20. Car cross-appointment.
Who is the most important
The first thing to compare is definitely the 25% small bias collision project in the mid-money research, in this test, the body The intensity will experience the most stringent test.
Three-car small bias collision detail
three cars contrast, it can be seen that ideal one is compared with the rigidity of the body than the mid-EC6 and Tes La Model3 has a slight gap, but in this test, the final score of the three cars is the same. It seems that ideal one has a slight cockpit deformed, but the degree of deformation and false harm evaluation do not exceed the boundary of deduction. Therefore, the final score has not been affected.
Here, you must specifically add a message, Tesla’s Model3 is deducted in the legs and footsteps of the small bias collision test, and like overseas collision tests, it is judged as the front door hinge invading driving. The cabin leads to a fake person legs and pedestrian injury deductions.
The ideal one did not get G on the score of the constraint system and the dummy, but A, the buckle points are increasing before the occupant. Through the video playback of the cabin, we can find that the ideal one of the side gas blinds are insufficient to protect the A-column, and the driver’s left front direction lacks airbag protection.
So, all the above information, the conclusion given by the State Teacher is The rigidity of EC6 is the most prominent, Model3, ideal one in these three cars is the lowest ranking, and from score is still g, the ideal one body rigidity can be said to be compared Standard setting,Such collision tests just reached the receiving limit of the body material, just produced a small amount of deformation, and did not reach the degree of deduction.
Of course, it is purely playing, such a conclusion, in fact, it means an old saying, a penny.
In addition to just, it also needs to be
, in the last week, the first two days of the latest collision test results in China, Tesla Model3 fried In the vicinity of the entrance located in a community in Shanghai, a Tesra Model3 fire exploded. This news believes that many friends have already understood. The official response of Tesla is also very rapid, and the most important point is that the high voltage battery at the bottom of the vehicle has caused internal electrical cell damage and short circuit after impact, and eventually leads to fire.
After the fire, the Model3 wreck is visible to the live residual fire foam 
, now let us return to this accident, according to the matter The picture shown on site shows that there is no large-sized obstacle. Even if the car chassis suffers from hit, it will not be a dramatic impact exceeding the general reserve.
Shanghai January 19th Tesla Model3 fire explosion accident site
1. After the model, the battery supplier LG Chemical Nanjing factory.
2, the fire position is only several tens of meters away from the garage entrance, and there is no large obstacle along the way.
3, the vehicle does not show the police before the fire, from the fire to the explosion within 5 minutes.
For the first point, the LG battery has twice a year in 2020, and the safety record is not brilliant, so the power battery of Nanjing factory is worthy of hidden dangers.
LG power battery has repeatedly recalls
second point, Tesla official response high pressure power battery suffered hitIncident, the state teacher is a real reason, is it a statement that the background is exploding? ! Is it in Black? What kind of impact is so fast, so strenuous thermal out of control, the public needs a clear explanation.
The third point, the vehicle has no exemplary police before the fire, from the long length of the fire to the explosion for less than 5 minutes, which is suspected of violating the mandatory national standard that is implemented on January 1, 2021.
The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has released electric vehicle mandatory national standard
this car is after January 1, 2021. Produced, or before January 1st. Although according to the residents of the same community, the time that the car appeared in the foundation should be around 1 month, so the general probability should be delivered before January 1.
However, after the mandatory national standard was issued in May 2020, most of the car companies have begun to adjust the product in accordance with national standard. If a Tesla Model 3 delivered at the end of 2020, there is no fire The first police, as well as the safety function design of the fire without explosion within 5 minutes after the heat loss, the teacher can only say, Tesla, you really dare to play!
I don’t know how many friends still remember the model of Model S in Shanghai Guanlo on April 21, 2019. 
April 21, 2019 Tesla Model S Fire Video
After more than two months, Tesla released There is almost no statement for any effective information.
Tesla last Shanghai’s fire accident is this unclear response, I don’t know if this happens in 119 such a special date of the fire explosion accident, Is it necessary for two months, oh, because the Spring Festival holiday, it is estimated that it takes three months after another, and a statement that does not have this use? I hope that I don’t want to, although the teacher is very pessimistic.
New energy, especially the safety of pure electric cars has always been the publicThe key point of concern, the collision test of the medium-protected research shows that electric vehicles are generally very hard in the rigidity and impact of the impact, and the electric vehicle is generally high-level active safety equipment, so driving in the road The security of new energy cars is still trustworthy.
However, the pure electric vehicle power battery safety function is not perfect, and it will never be able to relieve the concerns of the public, such as whether you should consider increasing the chassis impact test of the whole vehicle? Does the side tissue of the electric vehicle need to reduce the height of the impact, increase the speed of impact, so that the battery protective structure is subject to a more direct test? These are all places where the electric vehicle safety test standard needs to be improved.
Of course, the last state teacher still wants to represent the new energy car enthusiasts and users hope that Tesla can take more sincerity in the subsequent processing of this Shanghai 119 fire explosive event. Open more information, respond to the public in time, rather than being pushed to the owner, or push it to the supplier, so that it is not far away.