Skip to content

Who is it safer to EC6 and Ideal One? C-IASI test has exposed too much truth

Introduction | A dark war

On January 21, China’s public research announced the results of seven models of C-IASIs, and received attention from industries and many consumers.

Seven models include two new forces and five traditional models, respectively: 蔚 来 EC6, ideal one, Toyota RAV4 honor, BMW X3, Audi Q5L, Qichen Xing and Jianghuai Jia Yue A5.

From the results of the evaluation, it is coming to EC6 in the car, the car is traveling. People, the auxiliary safety is all excellent (G), and the results of good campaign and maintenance economy (a) have won this batch first.

Ideal One and Toyota RAV4 honor also achieve three excellent (G), but it is generally (m) in thadling and maintenance economy, so it is second.

BMW X3 and Audi Q5L have also achieved three excellent, but a poor (P) is obtained in campedibility and maintenance economy, so it is quantified as fourth.

Qichen star, Jianghuai Jiayue A5 won the sixth, seventh place, including the occupant in the car of Jiayue A5, the car outside the car, the minimum score; Qichen Star although the occupant in the car is excellent (g) However, the side collision results in its fine item are general (a).

Overall, most models of collision scores are not bad, and excellent (G) achievements in the car occupants, external pedestrians and auxiliary safety. Among them, the new potential for the payment is not ask, and the results of the BBA, especially the achievements of 蔚 来 EC6 are the highest score of C-IASI.

Second, it is a more secure?

As a new forces, the safety issues of the Ki-EC6 and the ideal one are subject to consumers, while triggering the hot discussion: Both, who is safer? We look at the results of the C-IASI assessment.

▎ 来 来 EC6 “Biji and Maintenance Economy” is good (a), better (m) of ideal one.

▎Although there are excellent (G) in other tests, there is also a difference, this difference is mainly in the “front 25 percent bias collision test”.

▲ Ideal One and Wei Si EC6 front 25% bias collision test

: Ideal One

: A column has a significant deformation, and there is a crack visible to the naked eye; there is a significant falling and elute in the middle and lower part of the B-column cover; the main driving threshold has obvious break and deformation; the instrument station invaded the driving cabin is more obvious, and the calf is close to the calf; The upper leg incision is about 90 degrees, and the foot is not in the collapse area.

The main airbag of the main drive is not perfect, can only play a local protective effect; the side air curtain is too short, if the fake person is not protected by the top 45 degrees before the left; the seat belt is binding to the dummy Poor, there is a pretty incidence.

蔚 来 EC6

: A column did not obviously bending; the B column is complete; the main driving threshold is full; the rim is completely broken after being hit, and there is too many invasion for the driving cabin; Taiwan intrusion is limited, larger with the calf spacing; the size of the upper leg is about 100 degrees, and the foot is not in the collapse area.

The main airbag is stable and comprehensive; the lateral air curtain deployment can be covered to the steering wheel, and the fake person should be protected by the first 45 degrees before the left; the seat belt is constrained to protect the front passenger Safety. From this group of contrasts, it is obviously winning EC6. Car Jun wants to mention a detail.

Ideal One of the airbag / gas curtain has a total of 7: 1 main driving airbag, 2 main driving knee airbag, 3 main driving left airbag, 4 left air curtain, 5 Deputy Driver Bag, 6 Edge Drive Tight Airbag, 7 right air curtain. I look more complete, but have you found a neutral file?

Left front, there is no gas curtain protection in front of the right

. This place is the main reason for the injury of Mr. Zhongfang, Mr. Shandong Expressway Rear-end, last year.

It is obvious that the 47 side gas curtain is not long, and the front end does not extend to the middle of the A column, and the complete combination is formed with the front airbag. Once there is a hit, it is easy to make the front passenger’s headMinistry is exposed to injury.

What is the correct side gas curtain opening mode? Look at the length of Volvo XC90 side air curtain – extended to the back of the steering wheel. The side gas curtain of the 蔚 来 EC6 is basically close to the length of XC90.

While Fan Mr. Fan although and ideal reached a reconciliation, this potential risk was once again hit by the medium insurance.

So, although 25% of the bias is superior, the ideal card is superior, and it should be near the upper limit.

Third, but ideal wins, win in a clever propaganda

However, ideal seems to become the biggest winner.

In a publicity picture, “Deluxe Brand China Baozhu Rating Rating Summary”, Ideal One is high, only to see the data in the car, the result is not wrong, Just why don’t you have more excellent 蔚 来 EC6?

Is it a luxury brand in the ideal eyes?

▲ The picture above is the medium security research test model. The picture below shows the publicity video model

▎ is more strange, ideal In the official propaganda video of the car, Ideal One in the C-IASI assessment, in fact, the vehicle used in the editing video is not the test vehicle in the middle of the investigation (promotional video “and medium The picture published by the inquiry is clearly different). This video is discovered, and it is found to be found by the eyes of the eyes and pointed out.

Forced to press the pressure, ideal in the comment Reply: Video vehicle is the internal test vehicle for demonstration, is not the original car crashing.

Then the problem is coming: it is not the collision of the middle, why is it specially mentioned in the title? And there is no statement in the video, is this not a water?

Someone commented: Ideal Vocal (JI) Ming (ZEI), if someone discovered the stolen column, then admit that it is not the original car; if no one finds,You can show off your own safety.

C-IASI (China Insurance Automobile Security Index) As the Chinese version of IIHS, its assessment is very strict, although the evaluation results are not enough for automobile safety The judgment standard, but also has a certain reference value.

So, how do you view the data? Just when “Take Chest”, you can find it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version