Skip to content

Kruse strong crash test analysis of the structure with outstanding results

RESEARCH mediator for a crash test conducted Kruse set of experimental models for the euphoric manual version 320T paragraph 2019, the final results unexpectedly, in addition to the structure of a low-speed collision experiment was class P (poor), the rest of the experiment , 25 including a front offset crash percentages have been class a or G evaluation.

crashworthiness and service economy [123 ] sex: P

24 out of maintenance economy, 7 points front, rear 0. Such a score is not absolute score, but relative to the 89,900 of the purchase price to determine first of all because the whole system comes standard with front LED headlamps are damaged, increasing maintenance costs; The tail stringers structural damage, increased maintenance costs.

because the simulation is a small accident, there is not much threat to the occupants, so low in fact structural experiments for the user reference sex is not too large. The results mainly for insurance companies, because the results will directly affect the insurance costs of this model.

An occupants Full index: G

The vehicle occupant safety index Kruse Although to get the G-evaluation, but in fact there are not significant at the group, the formation of these defects have potential hazards, but is limited to the price justifiable.

1, the percentage of positive offset collision 25: A

A vehicle structure obtained overall evaluation level. A standard column strength, intact, no significant bending; more complete structure of the vehicle, the passenger compartment space leg and knee slightly compressed, but less overall amount of invasion.

motion restraint system and obtain M dummy stages (generally) Evaluation Scoring wherein first side of the head protective airbag is not installed, excessive lateral displacement of the head, neck Ministry of injury risk; secondly, that your lack of restraint efforts dummies, resulting in a passenger leaning forwardover.

2, Side Impact: A

overall performance is very good, The main items are losing the protection of the driver head movement, received only M-class evaluation. We can be very intuitive to see from the following chart GIF, excessive lateral displacement of the driver’s head, although there are side airbags to protect the torso, but constraints on the head completely vacant, there is the risk of injury.

3, roof strength: G

4, the seat / headrest: G [ 123]

vehicle

layman security: G

(head experiment)

(leg experiment) [ 123]

[summary]

a few days ago mediator grinding collision experiment out as a big monster – Passat, 25 percentage offset collision experiment got only P, and this starting at Kruse scores of less than 90,000, but much stronger than the Passat, in fact, safe or not visible and can not be absolutely proportional to the prices. Brand gives the product a sense of responsibility determine whether the car really safe, Kruse as a SAIC-GM Chevrolet’s compact-class car, in addition to bear, “take the amount,” the task, holding the SAIC-GM-Chevrolet has even word of mouth wind, important It can be imagined.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *