recently circulated a chart on the accident scene diagram network, the protagonist is an ideal one and a BMW 3 Series.
Because on these two cars are considered a very weighty new car, coming together, naturally prone to lead the discussion. After all, watch the thing is never too big, especially a lot of people like from a car accident to find some “story” Let us call this behavior is called: eat melon.
melons for the masses interested in finding the story, nothing more than through some accident site map to identify which car more crashworthiness, many erroneous statements regarding Japanese cars unsafe It is the kind of eat melon from the masses, or someone with a good rhythm on the network rendering.
in the past to the present, they would like to pick the light of Japanese cars in the accident disastrous pictures talk too much, but shunned Japanese cars in the “upper hand” in the accident part.
and we have recently seen examples of this ideal one collision with the BMW 3 Series, the speakers on the network do not know whether with implication.
original words with an “off-axis” words, but also seemed to question why the mediator intentionally research almost ideal one collision results, it seems that questioned the safety of the ideal one.
Since it is clear that the right front wheel over the displayed image is indeed one does not appear in the normal position, generally speaking, it is indeed “off axis” a. And why did not the ideal one mediator research of crash test results, this problem is very simple, Bulgarian research also need a car to do a test, finding out, just because the ideal one yet did not participate in the research Mediator crash test.
back to the accident itself, in fact, this form of collision incidents are relatively less common, impaired left right in front of one of the ideal and the BMW 3 Series front, so you can rule out the possibility of head-on collision of two vehicles. Jun rut inference is the accident of two vehicles traveling the same direction. From the image point of view, the extent of the damage 3 Series is slightly lighter than the ideal one, because the 3 Series so-called “off-axis” did not happen.
this can not be used to judge the merits of the safety of the two vehicles, which is twoCar respective driving speed, the relative speed, impact angle and impact location have a relationship. Ideal one is really happening so-called “off-axis”, but as a demonstration of the ideal one is not strong enough, is too arbitrary.
simply resolve what “off-axis” thing, if the car happened off-axis that is unsafe, it must have a premise that has not been without normal collision force, a few years ago broken shaft event of a US-brand compact SUV would constitute safety risks. Occurs after
In the research of the mediator 25 percentage offset collision tests, the vast majority of such models subjected to collision “off-axis”, but with measuring vehicle parameters to obtain the best evaluation G does not conflict. So if you really want to understand the security system of a car, the best way is to get from crash tests. To determine the safety of vehicles from various accidents in the picture is very sloppy.
Of course, PICC study did not test the safety of the ideal one, and we hope Mediator research can accelerate progress, improve efficiency, as much as possible to test its safety for everyone the first time new car launch sex.
Author: Chen Houze
we only focus on original content production car, you want to get know better car, you can subscribe to our micro-channel public number: rut (ID: cartracks). Now hundreds of thousands of fans gathered, waiting for you!