All are popular models, Changan CS75 Plus and Bofeng PRO who is more fragrant

In addition to the old Haval H6, I believe that the following two cars have been familiar with familiarity. In the SUV sales list in January 2021, these two cars ranked the second third place. They are Changan CS75 Plus and Geelybo’s PRO.

If your budget is around 10 to 150,000. In addition to Haval H6, I believe many people will be entangled in these two cars. Next, we have a price, configuration, and power in the car from the price. This few aspects come to see which one is better. (Here we take these two types to do contrast: Changan CS75 Plus2.0T top and Bo Yue 1.8TD DCT top with version)

The price is 5100

Yuan, Boss PRO Compared to cheaper: Changan CS75 PLUS top match, manufacturer’s guide price is 154,900 yuan, the current price of dealers is 154,900 yuan; Bofeng PRO The top version of the manufacturer’s guide price is 146,800 yuan, and the reseller’s reference price is 140,800 yuan. At the guide price, the car is 8100 yuan.

In-vehicle space

CS75 PLUS

is even better, Storage space PRO is better : One of the most important indicators to buy SUV is space, especially the rear space space is more important. In terms of the size of the body, CS75 Plus is taken by PRO PRO. However, the length and width of Bofess PRO, which is slightly greater than Bo, but the width and wheelbase are not changed. It seems that CS75 Plus is better in spatial performance.

Unit mm

[123 ] [

Boss PRO

comes to the back row, the CS75 PLUS head space remains 1 punch, the remaining 2 fists in the legs; Baaxa PRO head space remains 1 punch, leg The remaining 1 punch. In the case of the body size information of the vehicle, it is clear that the CS75 PLUS is better.

These two cars are seen from the configuration of hardware, the differences between the two cars are not very large. And it is very rich. Like the LED headlight, LED daytime running light, adaptive far-collected light, automatic headlight, full liquid crystal dashboard, car network, OTA upgrade, electric rear preparation box, etc. have emerged.

The main passive safety configuration is no exception, ACC adaptive cruise, parallel assist, active brake, lane deviation warning, lane retention system, road traffic logo identification, The front and rear radar, the automatic parking, etc. are also equipped. Aspects of seat configuration, Bofess PRO’s width pilot sessile, CS75 PLUS is not configured. CS75 PLUS built-in driving recorder, but Bofess Pro is optional. Products cannot be perfect, or to see personal needs. In fact, China’s independent brand does not need too much concern in appearance, interior and configuration, has a higher maturity. Individuals are still more inclusive.

CS75 PLUS

Bookbook from the engine In view of information,

High axial distance [ 123]		1865	[123
[123 ] 4544	1713	2670	Xiaobian asked the two owners (around 180cm), and jumping the front seats to the lowest, and the remaining 1 punches in front of the front seat head in CS75 Plus; 1 punch 2 finger. So it looks good. However, the front seat support of the two cars is not very in place, and it will feel tired when driving. So the driver who has always opened long-distance is carefully considering it when buying.
CS75 PLUS’s car storage space looks more conventionally, and the inside of the front arming box is very deep, and some daily debris can be placed inside. Bofess ProThe front row is very rich. In addition to the routine operation, the electronic block of Bofess PRO has also split itself, increasing the storage area. Moreover, there is a small storage tank on the side of the seat, and there is no problem with daily small debris.	Configuration is equivalent, which one is good			It is not so good to open

Changan CS75 Plus has absolute advantages compared to Bofess PRO.

CS75 Plus
2.0T engine maximum power 233 hp, maximum torque 360 ​​cattle MIDDOT; rice, and matches 8-speed manual transmission.

Bofess PRO, its 1.8T engine maximum power 184 hp, maximum torque 300 cow middot; rice, matches 7-speed dual clutch gearbox.

Xiaobian based on multi-faceted information and feedback from the owner, summed up the advantages and disadvantages of these two cars in handling performance:

CS75 Plus

The chassis comfort is good

2. High-speed or medium-speed working conditions are good

3.

The steering hand is low-speed, and it has become stable in the high speed. Disadvantages:

Brake performance difference

2.

Accelerated ability is general

3. [123

Advantages of Bofess PRO: 1. The accelerator pedal has excellent consistency [ 123] The chassis setting is harder than CS75 Plus,

can provide a richer road feedback, and the movement is slightly better.

3. Seven

The smoothness of the speed double clutch alternator is very good 4. nhv performance is good. Disadvantages: 1. The speed of the gearbox is slow. 2. The first stage of the brake also has a bit of imaginary. When the acceleration of the full throttle, there will be a longer case between the speed of transmission and footsteps. Hysteresis.

Each has advantages and disadvantages, seeing personal needs Overall, these two cars have their own strengths and shortcomings. CS75 Plus From the appearance, it is more fashionable, exquisite, exquisite. The interior space is also better than Bible Pro, providing a more comfortable ride space. If you look from the driving system and drive, choose Bofess Pro or a better choice. I don’t talk about the interior space. First, I am more than CS75 Plus CS75 PLUS , but , the smoothness of the Bofeng PRO body is better, and the adjustment level is higher. If you value driving more, choose Bo Yue PROJust good. But it doesn’t mean that this car is the best, compared with the catenium 01 and other models, Bofess PRO gearbox still has a gap. Changan CS75 PLUS is relatively young in design, but it cannot be denied that it is more appropriate to ride space in the mechanical quality level, then you are more suitable for hidden spaces.