Skip to content

E-NCAP driver assistance evaluation results were out, cars method bottom, only a Japanese car list

differ from country C-NCAP, the European E-NCAP car safety tests has been one of the most stringent in Europe, so the E-NCAP has a high reputation in the international arena. The results of their vehicles tested high credibility, and therefore recognized by many owners. In this year, the European E-NCAP has introduced a new test project: driver assistance rating, mainly to test the new car auxiliary driving safety system on the highway.

The E-NCAP for driver assistance function evaluation criteria focused on two areas: complementary capabilities (vehicle driver participation and complementary capabilities) and safety aids cases. According to the performance test vehicle is divided into the “Getting Started” to “excellent” grade four.

A few days ago, E-NCAP announced the first batch of 10 models to participate in the auxiliary driving test rating, and test models are the latest, but slightly let ranking results people unexpectedly. Specifically, how their performance, with the view.

assist the driver rating test scores of the top three are Mercedes-Benz GLE, BMW 3 Series and Audi Q8, they have received “excellent” rating, visible in the secondary BBA capacity and safety aids aspects of performance worthy of recognition.

The evaluation of the performance of the Mercedes-Benz GLE quite eye-catching, with test scores 87.3 points ranked first. Mercedes-Benz GLE was able to get such results, because the system is able to map the speed limit information and real-time camera inputs based on the combination of speed limit signs can be identified, and can adjust the speed when entering the corners and intersections. In the ACC test scenario, Mercedes-Benz GLE anti-collision warning can quickly respond, and can do secure parking. In addition, Mercedes-Benz GLE is also equipped with head-up display function, you can more clearly see the vehicle information. Mercedes-Benz GLE vehicle assistance, driver involvement and performance aspects of security assistance have achieved higher scores, overall there is no obvious short-board. After

the performance of the BMW 3 Series followed by Mercedes-Benz GLE, and performance in terms of safety aids more than the Mercedes-Benz GLE, largely because of its specially equippedIndustry driver assistance function, when faced with an emergency, the safety auxiliary functions can quickly intervene to help owners complete brake to stop, to avoid accidents.

Audi Q8 vehicle auxiliary level of performance is quite high, as BMW and Mercedes-Benz GLE and 3, vehicles AEB can actively intervene to prevent vehicle collision. In addition, Audi Q8 is also equipped with blind spot monitoring function to prevent a collision with the neighboring car occurs when changing lanes.

on behalf of Ford models Ford sharp occasion, its equipped with a Co-Pilot 360 system, auxiliary aspects of vehicle performance is quite good . But Europe for driver assistance functions must be clearly marked with the “auxiliary” words, while Ford Edge is equipped with the occasion of Co-Pilot 360 system obviously does not have, therefore been penalized. Further, the auxiliary function does not recognize the car speed limit sign, the speed can not be well adjusted, also the reduction points.

VW Passat equipped vehicle assistance system can identify road conditions ahead, adjust the speed accordingly. But in the ACC test scenario, the Passat does not recognize the stationary vehicle, and AEB will not take the initiative to intervene to brake, so this test is only gained moderate rating.

has been known for safety, Volvo and did not get high marks in this test, but only to fall into a Volvo V60 “medium” rating, it is clearly safe accessibility points higher. When the vehicle is involved in a warning to alert the driver if the driver is no response, the system should intervene immediately and make the appropriate measures, but the car did not make any moves to remedy, so this test project penalized more severely .

Nissan Juke low scores in the vehicle auxiliary functions, so it can only “medium” performance. This is because it can not be a single speed limit sign recognition and multi speed limit sign recognition, not slow down the ramp, around the island and intersections. And in an emergency situation, it can not function AEB timely intervention, so the score is not high.

Tesla Model 3 performance in terms of driving assistance can be said to be among the best, especially with the car automatically, and can also very good performance with the car in the corners. In addition, it can take the initiative to intervene in a case where the driver does not respond, and prevent accidents, so it is the highest score in terms of safety aids. But Tesla Model 3 is also very obvious shortcomings, and Ford sharp occasion, like, Autopilot function is not marked “secondary” character, and therefore less points. And when owners driving Tesla Model 3 when turning the steering wheel will automatically exit Autopilot, apparently quite meet the operational logic of the driver, and then some points.

and the Renault Clio and Peugeot 2008 are relatively low overall level of driver assistance, and All test items scored low, so the test scores in the bottom 10 of the models. However, these two cars are the entry models, and not equipped with the latest technology on the vehicle auxiliary functions.

At present, more and more vehicles are beginning to join the auxiliary driving functions, but all models result in the actual test vehicle accessibility vary widely. Because of this, E-NCAP vehicle auxiliary function test was carried out to enable consumers to fully understand the differences among models in the vehicle driving assistance area. It is worth mentioning that most of the above models in the country will also be able to buy, and more complete in the vehicle auxiliary functions. While some domestic institutions are also trying to test aspects of the test vehicle driving aid, but fewer test items, test scale is relatively small. Therefore, the relevant agencies should increase testing testing in this area, the probability of such a vehicle accident will be greatly reduced.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *