[Che Xunwang vehicle inspection report] whether it should continue to exist, is a hot topic in recent months continued. Different location, very different point of view naturally. Derive benefit of people, will certainly be to sing the praises of the annual inspection; car owners, most of the goodwill of the annual nothing. So, decision-makers do? If the decision-making interests over the interests of the people can small groups, then, it’s time to weigh: the car deemed ldquo; official told us rdquo; behavior, compared with the improvement of automobile consumption environment, to find out which is more important. As a commentary in the car nearly 20 years of automotive media, my advice is: 1, changed the content of the annual inspection is limited to emissions testing; 2, cancel frequently detected 15 years later.
vehicle inspection mind, it is to urge every owner, be sure to keep the vehicle in good condition, thereby reducing the incidence of traffic accidents, laying a good foundation for traffic safety. In the 20th century, this idea is correct.
I had in 1988 and 1994, twice to buy the same brand of car, high failure rate, today’s owners, the unimaginable. The most exaggerated once, after the designated repair shop car repair home, foot brake, even wandering, almost reached the opposite lane. As for brake lights or turn signal failure occurs when there is. Visible for such a car, if not a little restraint measures will increase the number Zhibuding road accident.
At that time, even the joint venture vehicle, not necessarily how good quality. According to an old driver about 35 years ago, there is a myth later became a generation of classic cars, imported cars compared to the contemporary, the rough is not that the brake is not particularly spiritual. So that manufacturers dedicated staff to Beijing to communicate with the person in charge of the team. Manufacturers view is that the brakes no problem, the main driving force is very good. If this interpretation is put on today, will most probably within a few minutes, spread throughout the country, cited as a joke.
In the 21st century, slowly, getting better and better vehicle quality.
on the Internet, often was asked to go to Tibet by car, what is required for a vehicle to which the vehicle ready. I because the working relationship, often traveling far mdash; mdash; 16:00 mention cars, fitted luggage to go home 5:00, 6:00 departure immediately after dinner three or four daysLater, he gave the car from Beijing to Lhasa or open Ejin. This experience, I have many times, in fact, all thanks to the gift of good quality. Because the first time I drove to Tibet, with almost half car parts, repair two hours daily.
Today, the number of traffic accidents, due to car trouble?
I come into contact in the range, almost never heard of someone’s car, walked brakes gone. So, I’m curious, today’s accident, how many because of car trouble as a result? For example brake failure, lighting failure.
Of course, especially where non-operating passenger. Trucks and construction vehicles, the failure rate may be higher. Every trip, I would catch a later flight back to Beijing from the terminal road home, almost every time saw no steering trucks, cement trucks and muck cars are, or tail light is not lit, or when cornering lights. However, even if these cars inspection, I am afraid it is useless, because they have kept even the red light, visible emboldened.
If the accident was not due to failure of the mainstream, then the reason for the annual inspection also set it?
assume that the traffic control department of accident statistics can prove the main cause of traffic accidents, not car trouble, then, the old-established annual reason, you can set up? I do not see data in this area, saw and heard these years alone, the vague feeling that the majority of accidents are man-made, such as not to comply with traffic signs, lack of concentration, poor driving skills, too self-indulgent, and many more. Accident due to malfunction may have caused, but the proportion should be very low.
significance annual continuing in the end what is?
If I feel is right, but management still insists on continuing inspection, what is the meaning of it? Economic interests may be one sense, but not the detection field management business, right? I prefer to believe, but it has not changed the traditional thinking.
For example, the first step is to check the appearance inspection of the vehicle and driving license photo does not match, I am afraid there will be trouble. In fact, as long as the record done in advance, and even change the color of the body, replacing the engine it is legitimate. So, a modest change in appearance mdash; mdash; body some owners posted signs like, I think it is understandable. One of the foundation is to foster the expansion of automobile consumption of car culture, it should be allowed to exist personalization. Also like the seventies and eighties as the car made so serious, it is not necessary.
As another example, lighting failure, the brakes not working, it is the responsibility of the owners of their own commitment. Brake pads wear to a certain extent you have to replace the bulb does not light on, for one, is a vehicle maintenance program, very common content. If because of negligence, failed in its obligations to the best of out of the thing, of course, themselves. If the owners are aware of this, and clearly if such negligence occurs, the insurance companies will not even paid, I believe, we will certainly Bel initiative to safeguard their own car. Than every inspection, repair have been remembered for a long time is not on the brake lights, clearly more effective. Because the former is the norm, the latter only once a year. You said that from the perspective of maintaining road safety, which is better?
Therefore, I suggest that the annual inspection should read: 1, simplify inspection content; 2, cancel frequent inspection.
Recommendation 1, all non-passenger operations, from the date on the card for the first time, the first six years of the exemption, starting from the first seven years, once a year for emissions testing to ldquo; new car standards , old cars and old standards rdquo; principle.
Recommendation 2, after the cancellation of the annual increase in 15 years requires that all non-operating passenger cars, as long as emissions testing qualified every year, you can unlimited use.
In fact, 15 years after the increase in the number of annual inspection, inevitably giving a disguised hit the suspect. Car is durable goods, and the “Property Law” protection, no reason to suffer such unfair treatment.
the streets of Europe’s second-generation Golf and Audi 80, 1988, before the products are.
in Europe, North America and Japan, the car about 20 years, are not uncommon. I even saw the Beatles in the 1960s, the streets of Europe, Volvo 50s. But I’ve never heard people tolerance policy for new car sales constitute a barrierhinder. China’s current policies adopted to encourage the phase-out, to some extent, in the fight against people’s car consumption enthusiasm. Because, in effect forcing the owners to change, while reducing the residual value of the car, thereby reducing consumer desire; on the other hand, although the surface is to protect the environment, but in fact, the same is not small manufacturing pollution. If you abandon this antiquated notion, I think it can inspire enthusiasm to buy, effective development of the automobile consumer market.
in the annual review of existing projects, in fact, very easy to solve.
the contents of the current inspection, in addition to appearance, emissions, braking, lights and the like, comprising a further review of the content illegal recording, a triangular mark and the like. Cancel the annual inspection, the content is also very easy to solve.
illegal recording mdash; mdash; setting a time limit. From the date of the notification, within how many days did not accept the punishment, the penalty is automatically doubled.
triangle identifier mdash; mdash; this is sometimes parking, it must have. If there is no display, the imposition of penalties you can.
vehicle modification mdash; mdash; in moderately relaxed to allow flamboyant at the same time, to develop a filing system, all modifications involving traffic safety section, shall be filed before the modification, after modification review. Thereby increasing the costs, fees derived from the review.
In other words, if you like to play modified, you have to bear the cost. Do better than the current system more reliable mdash; mdash; play converted people, no matter what kind of change the car, and ultimately able to pass the annual inspection.
Some people think that is a vehicle inspection ldquo; rdquo ;, lucrative posts you put other people’s interests waste sources, and people can promise?
As the article mdash; mdash; “only improve the car environment in order to truly promote automobile consumption” in talking about the automobile industry chain is very long, our place in the economic field, if you do not want to lose it pieces, they should follow the example of other nations, it starts from the car to improve the environment. We discontent annual emotions, growing, is not a decision-making should carefully weigh the pros and cons, considerGains and losses:
what is considered to allow the car ldquo; official told us rdquo; behavior continues to exist, or should strive to improve the car consumption environment, so as to ensure the healthy and sustainable development of the automobile industry?
Further reading: to improve the car environment, in order to truly promote automobile consumption.
