yesterday, C-ISAI mediator research results published collision Xiaopeng G3 – the index of the vehicle occupant safety, car safety index layman, vehicle auxiliary safety index have received outstanding (G) evaluation, and crashworthiness repair economy index get worse (P) rating.
Note: C-ISAI evaluation system is “G” excellent, “A” good, “M” General, “P” poor
the impact of section 520 Xiaopeng G3 2020 is wisdom to enjoy long life version, the official guide price 179,800 yuan subsidy. Next, we analyze one by one, the true performance Xiaopeng G3.
■ first look at the evaluation standard C-ISAI’s
First of all, with our well-known C-NCAP different, because stakeholders C-ISAI is the insurance company, so they introduced the “resistance hit and maintenance of economic indicators, “the parameters of the test method is” low velocity collisions. ”
The second parameter is the “vehicle occupant safety index” test method “25 the percentage of positive offset collision”, “side impact”, “roof strength”, “seat / headrest.”
The third parameter is “car safety index layman” test method “pedestrian protection.”
The fourth parameter is the “vehicle auxiliary security index” test method “FCW / AEB”.
Here say a, C-ISAI differs C-NCAP is that there is no “positive 100 percentage overlapping rigid collision test” and “40 the percentage of positive overlap deformable impact test”, but more of a “positive offset collision percentage 25”, “roof strength”, “low velocity crash” three experimental projects.
■ vehicle occupant safety index
because C-ISAI in this one where the concept of “positive 25 percentage offset collision”, resulting in a lot of cars crashed here, such as the recently Passat. Since we focus on the highest level, then we began to talk from here.
Xiaopeng G3 results in “25 the percentage of positive offset collision” is “A”. Entry points is a “dummy head and neck injury” and “dummy restraint system and movement”, the results of the former is “A”, which is the achievement of “M”.
From the evaluation details C-ISAI published, we see the “restraint system and the dummy movement” score “M” because It includes a front head restraint airbag only partially positive effect, and since the side of the head-protecting air bag is not installed, excessive lateral displacement of the head, there is an occupant leaning forward over these three reasons.
is a talking, after collision dummy head encountered on the steering wheel airbag, and the airbag towards the margins, in contact with the inner side of the A-pillar, and in the subsequent inertia forces, the prosthesis reverse person’s head and hit the edge of the door. This series of actions, causing more than a few results from the video can clearly see this process.
Next is a “side impact” total score Xiaopeng G3 is “A”. The reason to drop points in the “occupant protection” and “protection of the driver,” the two are “not enough head movement to protect”, only to get an evaluation of “M”. I guess, this supra “positive 25 percentage offset crash” drop points as reasons to increase the post-facelift “head curtain airbags” A lot will improve.
As for other items, such as “roof strength”, “seat / headrest” Xiaopeng G3 have got “G” Excellent Evaluation. Especially the “roof strength” a, G3 Xiaopeng load mass ratio reached 4.45. This is equivalent to 4.45 to withstand the squeeze of its own weight, even on the evaluation of the results of the United States IIHS’s (actually the same), are more than the standard of excellence.
■ layman vehicle safety index
“layman vehicle safety index”, also known pedestrian protection, it is determined from the results of the “head-type test” and “legform test”. Wherein “head type test” out of 24 points, “legform test” marks 6. Xiaopeng G3 final score is 20.241 points, 67 percentage points, the final evaluation was “G” excellent. Wherein the first-type test score 14.241 points, 6 points legform test score.
We are here to highlight what the “head-type test.” Test, if the prediction data provided by the manufacturer, the evaluation method using the grid points; specific method is the headform test area is divided into several grid points, each grid point highest score 1.000 minutes, 0.000 minutes minimum.
If the manufacturer does not provide prediction data, the method using the average area of each region of highest scoring points 4.000, 0.000 lowest points, the percentage obtained, multiplied by 24, that is, the first-type test score.
■ vehicle auxiliary safety index
In fact, this study focused on an index is active safety features of the vehicle, it is indeed Xiaopeng G3 strengths. 520 2020 models tested wisdom to enjoy a long life version is equipped with brake assist, active braking / active safety systems, full-domain adaptive life, front and rear radar, and auxiliary line, traffic sign recognition, lane departure warning, lane keeping system, fatigue driving tips, a wealth of active and passive safety into place automatic parking, parking the car side early warning systems.
by the results of C-ISAI released, we saw Xiaopeng G3 in “FCW” item had 0 points, “AEB” has got full marks 5 score. What is the “FCW”, what is “AEB” it?
FCW refers to a forward collision warning system, that is, we often say that those “anti-collision warning,” by tone or vibration to alert the driver, if the vehicle in front is likely collision. However, note that this function itself is not going to help the driver to brake.
wanted to take the initiative to brake, you have to have the AEB function. AEB means automatic emergency braking, when the vehicle is judged when the vehicle in front is likely to collide, AEB automatically start, to help vehicle braking.
video has not been released, temporarily unable to play
Interestingly,AEB function normally with the car, most will be equipped with FCW function; but FCW function is not necessarily equipped with AEB function. We hope the next time facelift Xiaopeng G3, or replacement of time, can remedy this problem.
■ crashworthiness and maintenance of economic indicators
fundamental differences
this one is the C-ISAI and C-NCAP where, at the beginning of the C-ISAI was established purpose is to serve the insurance industry – collecting the results of the collision of the car, providing data support for the insurance company pricing.
you can simply understood that a low rating models, the future after the accident, the repair is more expensive. Currently 32 C-ISAI models recorded in up to 21 models in which a score of “P” poor. According to domestic media reports, G3 Xiaopeng low speed frontal collision repair cost structure, a total of 27,933.04 yuan; vulgar rear-end collision repair cost structure, a total of 6360.04 yuan. (Source: car reviews cool)
■ little sorry
In fact, not only Xiaopeng G3 regret, but C-ISAI, regret these C-NCAP crash test institutions. That is, there is currently no new energy vehicles, especially the complete test project of pure electric vehicles. The only test items, only a supporting role as an observer, and not the final result. The collision, G3 of electrolyte leakage Xiaopeng, REESS security, protection against electric shock and other system requirements are met.
■ state review
as a test of the first C-ISAI had a pure electric vehicle, is also the first car repairer new forces. Xiaopeng G3 relating to driver and passenger in the test project, got the overall excellent rating “G”, we have to point a praise! In fact, R & D Department, G3 Xiaopeng attaches great importance to vehicle safety, even before delivery of the interior also hit over 63 engineering vehicles. It is so, the C-NCAP collision, the G3 Xiaopeng also got a five-star rating.
Finally, the state teachers hope more car companies will own the new energy vehicles out “hit a bump”, to prove their strength, to dispel the doubts of the people; also hope that the great God who in the industry early introduction of the needleCollision Regulations for new energy vehicles. In addition, to be heard at C0ISAI a collision pure electric car is made in China Tesla Model 3, you expect it?