What should I look at the new energy car recall?

Recently, the State Market Supervision Administration Deficient Product Management Center issued 6 car recall announcements, involving Beiqi new energy, Infiniti, Jeep, Pad, Volvo and 6 brands A total of 40,219 cars will be recalled, including the pure electric new energy vehicles that need recalls more than 33,000 vehicles. This high proportion has undoubtedly deepens the question of consumers’ reliability for new energy vehicles. At the same time, they can’t help but let people think, the new energy car is clearly not started, how to recall is so serious?

The reason for the recall is mainly concentrated in the battery

First, let’s take a look at these 6 calls. In fact, in the recall of these 6 brands, Beiqi new energy has occupied 79.47 percentage ratios. Beiqi New Energy Automotive Changzhou Co., Ltd., Beijing Auto Co., Ltd., Beiqi (Guangzhou) Automobile Co., Ltd. decided to recall 3,1963 from November 1, 2016 to December 21, 2018 from March 24, 2021 EX360 and EU400 pure electric cars.

The recall is the difference in consistency of the vehicle power battery system, and the long-term continuous fast charge in the high temperature environment may result in deterioration of individual cellular battery cell performance, extreme conditions. The lower caused emergency failure, causing the power battery to get risks, there is a safety hazard. Therefore, the company will free test, repairs, and replace the module or battery packs when the vehicle power cells within the recall range, and upgrade the control policy software to eliminate security hazards.

The Chinese Consumer Association also said that 2020 consumers have mainly concentrated on new energy vehicles: First, the endless mileage “discount”, especially when the temperature is low, battery power is too fast, Charging speed does not match the propaganda. Second, battery quality problems are highlighted, battery failure, and more common charging failure. The third is that the gearbox is abnormal, and there is more problems such as the disappearance. The fourth is that there is a lot of repairs such as low service level, charging failure, can not completely solve it. It can be seen that once problems occur in the electric car, most of the reasons are concentrated on the core sector of the battery.

Carrigs and battery manufacturers jointly recall or become trend

Beiqi new energy problemThe pool is provided by Fu Can Technology, so Fu Can Technology will participate in this recall plan, and will also bear the relevant recall costs while cooperating with Beiqi new energy to recall the vehicle, and will bear the relevant recall fee, total 30 million -5000 10,000 yuan. This is also the first to explicitly announce the recall of battery recall costs and the restriction of the arbitrary battery recall.

In fact, a large number of recalls caused by battery reasons, there have been many cases in international. Take the modern Korea modern Korea. Modern cars announced in February this year to recall 8.2 million electric vehicles worldwide to replace the battery system. According to the latest report of Korean media, the recall estimates that the consumption is as high as 1.4 trillion won (about 8 billion yuan), and the modern car and LG chemistry have agreed to recall 8.2 million electric movements with the proportion of 3: 7. Cars are used to replace the battery. Among them, LG chemistry will bear the cost of approximately 5.6 billion yuan, and these two numbers exceed the net profit of many Chinese listed companies.

However, the previous LG is a problem that the product refusing to admit his own products, which is believed that there is no direct evidence that the vehicle is related to the battery, and the self-ignition event is mainly because the BMS of modern cars is not correct. The dispute between the responsibility of the power battery, the dispute between the vehicle enterprises and suppliers has always existed.

This kind of situation occurs, on the one hand, because the problem of the power battery itself needs time to overcome; plus the current cause and responsibility of the current electric vehicle problems and It is not clear, it is difficult to recover, because in addition to battery manufacturer, the quality of the upper reaches of supply chain, including the installation of the vehicle enterprise, all affect battery safety and battery stability; on the other hand, because recall costs Too big, it will lead to the willingness of the company’s recall. However, these problems are to be solved. After all, consumers are not “small white mice”, how can the test error have been completed in the use of consumers? So, in the near future, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Market Supervision Administration, etc., will adopt a number of measures such as technology, management, and strengthen the quality supervision of new energy vehicles. Although what measures will be taken, the supervision is ideal, we have not known, but at least in the supervision of the government department, the recall of the car enterprises will also addStrong, there will be a constraint and warning for battery manufacturers, upstream suppliers, etc., which is also conducive to forming a good market supply and demand environment.

In terms of power battery technology, a number of companies also placed the focus on battery security. By the two years, BYD, Ningde Times, Fu Can Technology, Xinwangda, Guangqi Yan and other companies have released a battery called “no fire”. Among them, BYD released blade battery claimed to be completely erased from the dictionary from the new energy car; Ningde Times announced the “never-fire” NCM811 three-yuan lithium battery; Guangqi Yan’s bombing battery is playing ” For the first time, the slogan of the three-dimensional lithium battery will not afford the fire “. For this exaggerated propaganda, the industry dispute is still relatively large, but in general, battery technology is indeed progressive.

New energy car is “touching the stone crossing the river”

Back to the original question, is the recall of new energy cars really high? Is this normal? According to the 20020 National Automobile and Consumer Product Recall, the 20020 National Automobile and Consumer Product Recallment situation is shown in the 20020 year, the whole year, my country has implemented the car recall in 199, involving 67.82 million vehicles, and the number of recalls decreased by 10.8% over the previous year. However, the number of recalls increased by 3.9%. Among them, the new energy car recalled 45 times, involving 357,000 vehicles, accounting for 5.3% of the total number of recalls in the year, and the total number of new energy vehicles recalled due to three-electric system defects, accounting for 31.3 percentage of total new energy car recall.

See this series of data, some people may have simple to take the annual car recall data to account for the annual car sales data, then find new energy vehicles The recall accounts are not high than traditional fuel vehicles, but in fact, this algorithm is not practical. For a simple example, 2020 Guangqi Honda Automobile Co., Ltd., Dongfeng Honda Automobile Co., Ltd. has a total of 1863,000 vehicles in Multi-vehicle models due to fuel pump manufacturing, and has been a total of 2020. The number of recalls has the most incident.

In addition, Toyota, Lexus, Guangqi Mitsubishi, Changan Mazda also recall, because the fuel pump can causeThe vehicle is turned off in the middle of the vehicle. However, this does not mean that the above brand itself is not worth trustworthy, and so many Japanese brands are involved in recall because the fuel pumps used by the recall are from the Japanese electricity. This is a type of high-scale recall in 2016 to 2018, which is a type of general-scale recall in 2016 ~ 2018. From the 2020 recall information, the vehicles recited due to the problem of the airbag still, but it is already very few.

Also discovered that the new power of my country’s new energy vehicle is three giants, the recall of the two years of the two years, and will find “new” “new” Energy cars have not yet started to sell, how to recall is so serious? “It is indeed a hole. For example, in June 2019, a total of 4,803 vehicles were equipped with the power battery packs produced from April 2, 2018 to October 19, 2018. However, according to the data released by the Akilak, as of May 2019, Jide was delivered to 17,550 ES8, and the recall has accounted for 27.37 percentage of total delivery.

In November last year, the ideal automobile recalls 10,469 ideal one produced by June 1, 2020, and the front suspension of the vehicle upgraded the ball is over the front suspension of the front suspension to reduce the user. The probability of taking out the swing arm ball head in the front suspension after the collision accident. However, from the end of 2019, I got a cumulative delivery in October 2020, but also said that Ideal One has sold more than 20,000 units, and I have called more than 10,000 vehicles.

Xiaopeng Automobile also announced since January 30, 202 this year, summary from March 29 to 2020, 2019, produced in September 27, 2019 Peng G3 car, a total of 13,399 vehicles. According to data, the total sales volume of Xiapeng G3 in 2019 is 16,608, and the total sales volume of Xiaopeng G3 in 2020 is 11,691, which can be seen that this recall is basically more than 50%.

In addition, the industry is driven, the industry has emerged in a batch of new energy industry chain related companies, overcapacity, and excessive investment risk. However, this series of issues appear in the industry, all of which belong to the development of emerging industries. From the development of the fuel truck, the current new energy vehicle is experiencing the stage of “touching the stone crossing the river”. During the entire industry, the quality of new energy vehicles, product recalls, user complaints, etc. will also become the experience and lessons of the incentive industry.

Most importantly, whether it is the national level or consumer end, people have realized these issues, and sincerely hope to change these status quo.

Figure | Source from the network

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *