If a joint venture enterprises is a problem, many people will think of the training and preparation Chinese pot party, it seems that in their eyes, are foreign white lotus, only our Chinese car companies like cutting corners. However, with the Bulgarian Institute SAIC Roewe RX5 MAX collision results announced, SAIC direct hit these people face, because it’s more than a lot of achievements to the joint venture model performance!
According to China Insurance Institute published crash results Roewe RX5 MAX, the Roewe RX5 MAX’s overall performance is very good, except for the low-speed economy to obtain P, other achievements are all G , which is excellent. Then we analyzed one by one.
First, a low-speed collision, the air bag does not burst RX5 MAX low-speed collision, which is preferred because the low-speed collision 15km / h, if the airbag deployment only We can not protect the safety of the crew, but will cause additional damage because of the powerful impact of the airbag.
But why RX5 MAX or just get a P it? The problem lies in the economic maintenance. Data published by the official point of view, RX5 MAX low speed frontal collision repair economy score only 3 points, head-on collision economy accounting for 13.06 percentage. Calculated in accordance with the collision model guidance 128,800, repair price is 16,800, for a price of more than ten thousand independent brand SUV 12, the repair cost is not low.
Of course, repair your point, after all, the insurance company does, while passenger car project is directly related to the life safe. In 25 percentage offset crash we are most concerned in, RX5 MAX’s performance is very good, very complete body structure, airbags and side curtain also effectively protect the safety of the driver, scoring all of G, beyond the collar 01 grams and Biyaditang become a mediator Institute crash tests, only 25 percentage points all collisions G of own-brand models.
Specifically, RX5 MAX collision in the cockpit structure is very good, A pillar without significant deformation, there is no intrusion into the vehicle console.
From the perspective of the vehicle, the front and side curtain airbags role played stably, and not as part of the vehicle as the airbag deviation. In addition, RX5 MAX of side curtain airbags and side airbags are whole system comes standard, which is a lot better than many joint-venture brands conscience.
So why RX5 MAX 25 percentage offset collision can get good reviews of it? In addition to stabilizing and curtain airbags play a role, but its design is also very important. By disassembled perspective view of the collision, RX5 MAX of the front impact beam (yellow box) used a widened design, while the front side of the beam (blue boxes) are very thick, and extends to the front of the front most.
The official structure diagram also illustrates this point, which represents the RX5 MAX in the beginning to develop a 25 percentage offset collision, the entire front design has become a complete closed-loop, as long as enough strength steel, the end result will not be a difference.
Next is a side collision, RX5 MAX performance in a side impact is still stable overall score G, B from the driver’s seat and the center line of the pillar to 20.5cm while Department standard side curtain airbags can protect the head of the occupants from injury in a side collision.
In the roof strength test, RX5 MAX roof peak load of 84,042 cows, to 5.41 times the weight of the vehicle, four times higher than the standard of excellence, score as G.
as well as in the rest of the layman safety test car safety support system, RX5 MAX no ball dropped, by all excellent, active braking system plays a role very stable .
Overall, the majestic RX5 MAX can be said SAIC I played a turnaround, after all, have a joint venture with SAIC before several models in crash test research Mediator performance is very poor, which a lot of people feel that SAIC joint venture vehicle problems, SAIC blame shoddy work.
However, the actual result gave these people a slap in the face, SAIC’s own RX5 MAX is not only its own brand in one of the best performance, but even more than the vast majority of the joint venture brand. You know, in the Bulgarian research and testing over the car, in addition to individual low-speed crash all G models all get really small.
Therefore, if the joint venture vehicle what’s wrong, do not worshiper of foreign things to China’s first pan training and preparation. You know, in joint ventures, foreign usually have a higher right to speak, any form of shoddy work, had foreign consent to it! I also believe that the Chinese people dedicated pits Chinese people such a thing, our car prices is not easily promised!